15May Canon 5D Mark III (Body Only) Available

7 Comments

1. 1
   
   apostolos
   May 16th, 2012 at 6:11 pm
   

   Hey Emm:

   Do you own one? How does it do in ISO 1600 and 3200 FOR STILLS, compared to the mkII. I have the mkII for stills, and due to the underwhelming general response towards it for video, I have not put it in my purchase list in the near future.

2. 2
   
   Emm
   May 17th, 2012 at 12:43 am
   

   @apostolos – Yes I have a Canon 5D Mark III. For video only, the low light is awesome, but it might not be enough to justify the price difference to the discounted 5D Mark II. For a ’stills photo’ camera, this is the best Canon has released in a long time, and well worth the price.

3. 3
   
   Meji
   May 17th, 2012 at 3:14 pm
   

   apostolos – you should check out philip blooms review on it. its pretty damn good.

4. 4
   
   SightWorkz
   May 17th, 2012 at 3:34 pm
   

   I’m trying to hold out to see if Canon releases a 7d replacement with a swivel screen. If it doesn’t pan out I’m just going to take the plunge.

5. 5
   
   Apostolos
   May 17th, 2012 at 4:21 pm
   

   A friend of mine just bought it, so I’ll be checking it out firsthand soon.

6. 6
   
   Joel
   May 18th, 2012 at 2:52 pm
   

   apostolos ~ Are you kidding? The headphone jack and onscreen audio level metering on the mk III is worth the upgrade by themselves.

7. 7
   
   Leok17
   June 10th, 2012 at 10:25 am
   

   Why a camera this pro doesnt have a built in flash?

Leave a Comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website